CAD: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
https://openscad.org/ | https://openscad.org/ | ||
- Good: Programming interface, open-source | - Good: Programming interface, generative and parametric designs, open-source | ||
- Bad: For fast detailed designs | - Bad: For fast detailed designs | ||
==== Documentation ==== | |||
- https://openscad.org/documentation.html | |||
- https://openscad.org/cheatsheet/ | |||
=== Blender === | === Blender === | ||
| Line 48: | Line 51: | ||
- Bad: For fast designs, not easy to use | - Bad: For fast designs, not easy to use | ||
=== SolidCraft === | |||
https://github.com/tangency-labs/solidcraft | |||
- Good: Open-source parametric CAD, MCP (Model Context Protocol) server | |||
- Bad: Early-stages of development | |||
Latest revision as of 18:20, 18 October 2026
3d printing
TinkerCad
- Good: For fast designs using shape primitives, easy to use
- Bad: For precision, parametric and generative designs
OpenSCAD
- Good: Programming interface, generative and parametric designs, open-source
- Bad: For fast detailed designs
Documentation
- https://openscad.org/documentation.html - https://openscad.org/cheatsheet/
Blender
- Good: For precision, parametric and generative designs, open-source software
- Bad: For fast designs, not easy to use
Rhino 3D
- Good: For precision, parametric and generative designs
- Bad: For fast designs, not easy to use, license required
Autodesk Fusion
https://www.autodesk.com/solutions/fusion-360-3d-modeling
- Good: For precision, simulations
- Bad: For fast designs, not easy to use, license required
FreeCAD
- Good: For precise designs, free software
- Bad: For fast designs, not easy to use
SolidCraft
https://github.com/tangency-labs/solidcraft
- Good: Open-source parametric CAD, MCP (Model Context Protocol) server
- Bad: Early-stages of development